Claims

Parents of students with IEPs share a common vision of an ideal school that is safe, supportive, academically strong, and inclusive with needed supports

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All parents in the sample envisioned a school that was safe and supportive, with a strong academic environment providing needed supports and services within an inclusive climate. → Cowhy 2023

Evidence

Cowhy 2023

Cowhy, J.R., Gordon, M.F., & de la Torre, M. (2023). Forced to choose: Lessons learned from families of students within special education. Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048231198814

q2 · i? · qualitative · r1

Qualitative interview study of 29 parents of students with IEPs after the 2013 Chicago school closures. The findings section reports that "All parents in our sample had visions for what an ideal learning environment would look like for their child" centering safety, academics, and inclusion.

"All parents in our sample had visions for what an ideal learning environment would look like for their child: a school that was safe and supportive, with a strong academic environment which provided their children with the supports and services they needed within an inclusive climate."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id iep-parents-shared-ideal-school-vision
title Parents of students with IEPs share a common vision of an ideal school that is safe, supportive, academically strong, and inclusive with needed supports
description Parents of students with IEPs share a common vision of an ideal school that is safe, supportive, academically strong, and inclusive with needed supports
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
recheck_by 2028
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — cowhy-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.