Claims

IL course attendance and grades correlated strongly with biology course attendance and final grades (r = 0.588 to 0.848), and were stronger predictors than preentry AAR scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Correlations between IL attendance/grade and biology attendance/final grade were consistently strong, ranging from r = 0.588 to 0.848 across two years. → Arendale 2014 q2 i? The authors report IL attendance and grade were a stronger predictor of biology final grade than the AAR preentry measure, suggesting AAR was not predictive for IL enrollees. → Arendale 2014

Evidence

Arendale 2014

David R. Arendale. (2014). Understanding the Integrated Learning Course Model: Academic Transition to Tertiary Education. International Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p1

q2 · i3 · associational · r1

Correlational analysis combining all IL and introductory biology sections across 2002 and 2003. Table 3 reports IL attendance + biology final grade r = 0.588, IL final grade + IL attendance r = 0.848, IL attendance + biology attendance r = 0.607, and IL final grade + biology final grade r = 0.820.

"As demonstrated in Table 3, the correlations were consistently strong (r = 0.588 to 0.848). Similar patterns occurred in every class section in each academic term over the two years of the study."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.