Claims

TRIO students enrolled in the IL course linked to introductory psychology earned statistically significantly higher final course grades than matched and TRIO control students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a fall 2002 quasi-experimental study, IL course students' end-of-semester total points differed significantly from TRIO controls, with an overall ANOVA of F(2, 29)=6.53, p<.01. → Arendale 2014

Evidence

Arendale 2014

David R. Arendale. (2014). Understanding the Integrated Learning Course Model: Academic Transition to Tertiary Education. International Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental fall 2002 study of eight TRIO SSS students in the IL course linked to introductory psychology, compared with a matched-pairs control (mean ACT 14.5) and a TRIO control (mean ACT 13.7). The article reports "F(2, 29)=6.53, p<.01" on final total points; no effect size is printed.

"The overall ANOV A revealed F(2, 29)=6.53, p<.01 and the Scheffe contrasts showed the [IL course] students differed significantly from the TRIO controls (p<.01)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.