Claims

Immediate feedback combined with reflection improved diagnostic accuracy on training cases versus outpatient clinic attendance or lecture

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Immediate feedback + reflection, compared to attending an outpatient clinic or outpatient clinic plus lecture, had a statistically significant and very large effect on diagnostic accuracy in training cases (SMD 1.462 and 1.237 respectively). → Delavari S 2024

Evidence

Delavari S 2024

Delavari S, Barzkar F, Rikers MJP, Pourahmadi M, Soltani Arabshahi SK, Keshtkar A, Dargahi H, Yaghmaei M, Monajemi A. (2024). Teaching and learning clinical reasoning skill in undergraduate medical students: A scoping review. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309606

q3 · i3 · review · r3

The review reports this from Choi et al.'s study (reference [77]): feedback plus reflection beat both comparison conditions on diagnostic accuracy for training cases, with printed effect sizes SMD = 1.462 and SMD = 1.237. The discussion notes effects in the control set were nonmeaningful and minimal.

"immediate feedback + reflection in comparison to attended outpatient clinic or combination of outpatient clinic + lecture had a statistically significant and very large effect on diagnostic accuracy in training cases (SMD,1.462 [0.894–2.029] and SMD, 1.237 [0.649–1.825], respectively)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.