Claims

Participants incidentally acquired an average of 3.19 of 20 target words after reading two passages

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants incidentally acquired an average of 3.19 out of 20 target words (SD = 2.20). → Zhao 2016

Evidence

Zhao 2016

Zhao, A., Guo, Y., Biales, C., & Olszewski, A. (2016). Exploring learner factors in second language (L2) incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2). http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl doi:10.64152/10125/66903

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Descriptive statistics from the unannounced 20-item vocabulary test administered after 25 minutes of reading two passages; scores were pre-knowledge-adjusted. Mean acquisition was "3.19 out of 20 target words (SD = 2.20)".

"The data showed that participants incidentally acquired an average of 3.19 out of 20 target words (SD = 2.20) after reading the two passages."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id incidental-acquisition-rate-3-of-20-words
title Participants incidentally acquired an average of 3.19 of 20 target words after reading two passages
description Participants incidentally acquired an average of 3.19 of 20 target words after reading two passages
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — zhao-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.