Claims

Mastery of incidental vocabulary learning strategies positively predicts L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Mastery of strategies was a significant positive predictor of incidental vocabulary acquisition (β = .20). → Zhao 2016

Evidence

Zhao 2016

Zhao, A., Guo, Y., Biales, C., & Olszewski, A. (2016). Exploring learner factors in second language (L2) incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2). http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl doi:10.64152/10125/66903

q2 · i2 · associational · r2

In the multiple linear regression (N = 129), mastery of strategies measured by the MIVLSS (26 items, α = 0.88) was a significant positive predictor, "β = .20, t = 2.04, p < .05".

"mastery of strategies (β = .20, t = 2.04, p < .05) were significant positive predictors of L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id strategy-mastery-predicts-incidental-vocabulary-acquisition
title Mastery of incidental vocabulary learning strategies positively predicts L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading
description Mastery of incidental vocabulary learning strategies positively predicts L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — zhao-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.