Indigenous peoples were commonly involved in developing cultural safety training programs (70% of described programs), but their specific roles were rarely specified¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2–r3·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Of 69 papers describing a cultural safety training program, more than two-thirds (n = 48; 70%) mentioned Indigenous involvement in the training development process. → MacLean Tammy L. 2023
q3 i? While a substantial proportion of interventions involved Indigenous people in development, the specific roles they undertook were rarely mentioned. → MacLean Tammy L. 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
MacLean Tammy L. 2023¶
MacLean Tammy L., Qiang Jinfan Rose, Henderson Lynn, Bowra Andrea, Howard Lisa, Pringle Victoria, Butsang Tenzin, Rice Emma, Di Ruggiero Erica, Mashford-Pringle Angela. (2023). Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065217
q3 · i? · review · r3
Frequency analysis of the 69 included papers describing a cultural safety training program. The review reports Indigenous involvement in development was mentioned in n = 48 (70%) of these papers.
"Of the papers that described an Indigenous cultural safety training program (n = 69), more than two-thirds mentioned the involvement of Indigenous peoples in the training development process (n = 48; 70%)"
MacLean Tammy L. 2023 (2)¶
MacLean Tammy L., Qiang Jinfan Rose, Henderson Lynn, Bowra Andrea, Howard Lisa, Pringle Victoria, Butsang Tenzin, Rice Emma, Di Ruggiero Erica, Mashford-Pringle Angela. (2023). Indigenous Cultural Safety Training for Applied Health, Social Work, and Education Professionals: A PRISMA Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065217
q3 · i? · review · r2
The review's synthesis of the development-process data across included studies. The authors note that despite common involvement, the specific roles Indigenous people undertook were rarely specified in the source articles.
"Moreover, while a substantial proportion of these training interventions involved Indigenous people(s) in the development processes, the specific roles they undertook were rarely mentioned."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Half of described training interventions involved Indigenous people in delivery (51%), and university professors/administrators were the most frequently mentioned deliverers (36%) — related
- Evaluation of cultural safety training interventions was inconsistent: 46% of papers evaluated programs, methods varied widely, post-surveys were most common, and only half stated evaluation limitations — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.