Symmetry of partner models does not rule out a contribution of individual modelling abilities to mutual modelling quality¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The finding that partner models are symmetrical does not rule out the fact that individual abilities also contribute to the quality of the modelling process. → Dillenbourg 2016

Evidence¶

Dillenbourg 2016¶

Dillenbourg, P., Lemaignan, S., Sangin, M., Nova, N., & Molinari, G. (2016). The symmetry of partner modelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9235-5

q3 · i? · associational · r?

Authors' qualification, stated in the article's abstract, of the symmetry results reported across five collaborative experiments: correlated mutual-model accuracies are interpreted carefully, and individual modeler/modelée abilities remain a possible contributor. This is the article's own interpretive caveat, not an additional statistical result.

"However, these findings do not rule out the fact that individual abilities also contribute to the quality of modelling process."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In most of the reported collaborative experiments, the accuracy of the partner model A built about B was correlated with the accuracy of the model B built about A — related
• The quality of mutual models appears to depend more on the quality of interactions than on individual representational abilities — related
• Partner-model quality emerges through the task and is sensitive to awareness tools and media richness, partly contradicting the assumption that partner modelling is an individual skill — related