In most of the reported collaborative experiments, the accuracy of the partner model A built about B was correlated with the accuracy of the model B built about A¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Across five experiments on collaborative problem solving or collaborative learning, in four studies the accuracy of the model that A built about B was correlated with the accuracy of the model that B built about A. → Dillenbourg 2016
Evidence¶
Dillenbourg 2016¶
Dillenbourg, P., Lemaignan, S., Sangin, M., Nova, N., & Molinari, G. (2016). The symmetry of partner modelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9235-5
q3 · i? · associational · r?
Summary of five experiments on collaborative problem solving and collaborative learning reported in this peer-reviewed journal article: in four studies, mutual partner-model accuracies were correlated. The article states this correlation but prints no effect size, so no magnitude is reported here.
"In 4 studies, the accuracy of the model that A built about B was correlated with the accuracy of the model that B built about A"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The five mutual-modelling experiments varied how important it was to build an accurate model (task) and how difficult it was to build one (setting)
- The quality of mutual models appears to depend more on the quality of interactions than on individual representational abilities — a broader claim this one bears on
- Partner-model quality emerges through the task and is sensitive to awareness tools and media richness, partly contradicting the assumption that partner modelling is an individual skill — a broader claim this one bears on
- Symmetry of partner models does not rule out a contribution of individual modelling abilities to mutual modelling quality — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
partner-model-accuracy-symmetry-correlated |
title |
In most of the reported collaborative experiments, the accuracy of the partner model A built about B was correlated with the accuracy of the model B built about A |
description |
In most of the reported collaborative experiments, the accuracy of the partner model A built about B was correlated with the accuracy of the model B built about A |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
recheck_by |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — dillenbourg-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.