Individual differences predicted response: estimated IQ predicted growth during intervention on seven of eight outcomes, while vocabulary and visual sequential memory predicted growth during follow-up¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Estimated IQ predicted growth during intervention on seven of eight outcomes. → Lovett 2017
q3 i? Growth during follow-up was predicted by vocabulary and visual sequential memory. → Lovett 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Lovett 2017¶
Lovett, Frijters, Wolf, Steinbach, Sevcik, & Morris. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000181
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Individual-differences growth modeling across the repeated measures of the intervention period; the article reports "Estimated IQ predicted growth during intervention on seven of eight outcomes"; no effect size printed.
"Estimated IQ predicted growth during intervention on seven of eight outcomes."
Lovett 2017 (2)¶
Lovett, Frijters, Wolf, Steinbach, Sevcik, & Morris. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000181
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Follow-up growth modeling using pretest predictor variables (PPVT-III receptive vocabulary; Visual Sequential Memory); the article reports "Growth during follow-up was predicted by vocabulary and visual sequential memory"; no effect size printed.
"Growth during follow-up was predicted by vocabulary and visual sequential memory."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- General Cognitive Ability — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- First-grade intervention children continued to grow at faster rates than 2nd-grade intervention children over 1–3 follow-up years on six of eight key reading outcomes — related
- A meta-analysis attributes the strongest predictors of nonresponsiveness to rapid naming and problem behavior — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
individual-differences-predict-intervention-growth |
title |
Individual differences predicted response: estimated IQ predicted growth during intervention on seven of eight outcomes, while vocabulary and visual sequential memory predicted growth during follow-up |
description |
Individual differences predicted response: estimated IQ predicted growth during intervention on seven of eight outcomes, while vocabulary and visual sequential memory predicted growth during follow-up |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — lovett-2017, lovett-2017-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.