A meta-analysis attributes the strongest predictors of nonresponsiveness to rapid naming and problem behavior¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Nelson, Benner, and Gonzalez's meta-analysis reported noteworthy predictors of treatment effectiveness: rapid naming (Zr = 0.51), problem behavior (Zr = 0.46), phonological awareness (Zr = 0.42), alphabetic understanding (Zr = 0.35), memory (Zr = 0.31), IQ (Zr = 0.26), and demographics (Zr = 0.07). → Al Otaiba 2006
Evidence¶
Al Otaiba 2006¶
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who Are the Young Children for Whom Best Practices in Reading Are Ineffective? An Experimental and Longitudinal Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 414-431. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00222194060390050401
q2 · i? · causal · r2
The article reports, citing Nelson, Benner, and Gonzalez (2003), a meta-analysis extending the authors' earlier review with seven additional studies of nonresponders. The review attributes the printed Zr values for seven learner characteristics to that meta-analysis.
"Second, they used meta-analytic tech- niques to explore the relative im- portance of individual learner charac- teristics to treatment effectiveness. Noteworthy predictors were rapid naming (Zr = 0.51), problem behavior (Zr= 0.46), phonological awareness (Zr = 0.42), alphabetic understanding (Zr = 0.35), memory (Zr = 0.31), IQ (Zr = 0.26), and demographics (Zr = 0.07)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Phonological awareness and rapid naming differentiate inadequate responders with word reading deficits from those without — related
- Naming speed, vocabulary, sentence imitation, problem behavior, and amount of intervention correctly classify most nonresponsive and always responsive students — related
- In the Nelson, Benner, & Gonzalez (2005) RCT, SSL produced statistically significant positive effects on all five alphabetics outcomes — related
- Nonresponsiveness to kindergarten intervention is persistent and predicts school-identified reading problems through third grade — related
- Nonresponsive students scored significantly lower than always responsive students on seven measures and higher on problem behavior — related
- Individual differences predicted response: estimated IQ predicted growth during intervention on seven of eight outcomes, while vocabulary and visual sequential memory predicted growth during follow-up — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
meta-analysis-predictors-of-nonresponsiveness |
title |
A meta-analysis attributes the strongest predictors of nonresponsiveness to rapid naming and problem behavior |
description |
A meta-analysis attributes the strongest predictors of nonresponsiveness to rapid naming and problem behavior |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — al-otaiba-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.