Students who benefited from retrieval practice rated it as more effective after receiving individual feedback, while other groups showed no statistically significant change (Experiment 1)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-22 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Students who obtained a higher score after retrieval practice rated retrieval practice as more effective after individual feedback (t(24) = 4.26, p < .001, d = .56). → Luotong Hui 2021 q3 i? No statistically significant change in beliefs was found for the same-score group (p = .17) or the restudy-benefit group (p = .50), which does not show that their beliefs were unchanged. → Luotong Hui 2021 (2)

Evidence¶

Luotong Hui 2021¶

Luotong Hui, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Jeroen Donkers, & Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. (2021). Does Individual Performance Feedback Increase the Use of Retrieval Practice? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09604-x

q3 · i2 · causal · r1

Experiment 1 paired-samples t-test on the 7-point retrieval practice beliefs scale before and after individual feedback for the retrieval-benefit subgroup (n = 25): students "positively changed their retrieval practice beliefs", d = .56.

"students who had benefited from retrieval practice positively changed their retrieval practice beliefs (t(24) = 4.26, p <. 0 0 1 ,d = .56)"

Luotong Hui 2021 (2)¶

Luotong Hui, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Jeroen Donkers, & Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. (2021). Does Individual Performance Feedback Increase the Use of Retrieval Practice? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09604-x

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Experiment 1 paired-samples t-tests on retrieval practice beliefs for the same-score group (p = .17) and restudy-benefit group (p = .50): "This was not the case" for either group; no effect sizes printed for these nulls.

"This was not the case for students who had obtained the same score ( t(20) = 1.43, p = .17), nor for those who had benefited from restudy ( t(13) = -.69, p =. 5 0 ) ."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Individual feedback impacted perceived utility only to a limited extent, and general feedback lowered perceived utility of retrieval practice (Experiment 2) — related
• Individual performance feedback increased retrieval practice choice only among students who had actually benefited from retrieval practice (Experiment 1) — related