Individual performance feedback increased retrieval practice choice only among students who had actually benefited from retrieval practice (Experiment 1)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Retrieval practice decisions after feedback depended on which strategy the student benefited from: a significant group × decision interaction (F(2, 57) = 8.42, p < .001, ηp2 = .23). → Luotong Hui 2021
q3 i? The retrieval-benefit group significantly increased retrieval practice choice after feedback, the same-score group showed no difference, and the restudy-benefit group significantly reduced retrieval practice choice. → Luotong Hui 2021 (2)
Evidence¶
Luotong Hui 2021¶
Luotong Hui, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Jeroen Donkers, & Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. (2021). Does Individual Performance Feedback Increase the Use of Retrieval Practice? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09604-x
q3 · i3 · causal · r1
Experiment 1 repeated measures ANOVA on retrieval practice choice before and after individual feedback, grouping participants by which strategy benefited them. The "interaction effect between the groups and retrieval practice decisions" was statistically significant, ηp2 = .23.
"we found an interaction effect between the groups and retrieval practice decisions that was statistically significant (F(2, 57) = 8.42, p <. 0 0 1 ,ηp2 = .23)"
Luotong Hui 2021 (2)¶
Luotong Hui, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Jeroen Donkers, & Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. (2021). Does Individual Performance Feedback Increase the Use of Retrieval Practice? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09604-x
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Follow-up comparisons in Experiment 1 by benefit subgroup: the retrieval-benefit group increased retrieval practice choice (p < .01), the same-score group showed "no difference in strategy choice" (p = .90), and the restudy-benefit group significantly reduced it (p = .01). No effect sizes printed for these subgroup contrasts.
"the retrieval-benefit group revealed a significant increase in retrieval practice choice after receiving feedback ( p <. 0 1 ) ;t h es a m e -score group showed no difference in strategy choice between the two measurements (p =. 9 0 ) ; and the restudy-benefit group significantly reduced retrieval practice choice after feedback (p = .01)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students who benefited from retrieval practice rated it as more effective after receiving individual feedback, while other groups showed no statistically significant change (Experiment 1) — related
- Only individual performance feedback, not general instruction about the testing effect, produced long-term increases in retrieval practice use, and only for students who benefited from retrieval practice — a broader claim this one bears on
- In an exploratory Experiment 1 subgroup analysis, the preference for blocked studying after feedback disappeared among students who actually performed better with interleaved studying — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
individual-feedback-increases-retrieval-practice-choice-only-for-beneficiaries |
title |
Individual performance feedback increased retrieval practice choice only among students who had actually benefited from retrieval practice (Experiment 1) |
description |
Individual performance feedback increased retrieval practice choice only among students who had actually benefited from retrieval practice (Experiment 1) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — luotong-hui-2021, luotong-hui-2021-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.