Access to restorative practices is inequitable: schools with more Black and economically disadvantaged students show lower restorative practice utilization¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Even after controlling for school-level factors, schools with higher proportions of Black and/or economically disadvantaged students evidenced lower restorative practice utilization. → Darling-Hammond 2023
q2 i? Even within a given school, restorative practice exposure is lower for Black students and students from low-income families. → Darling-Hammond 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Darling-Hammond 2023¶
Darling-Hammond, S. (2023). Fostering belonging, transforming schools: The impact of restorative practices. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/169.703
q2 · i? · associational · r2
School-level regression analysis of restorative practice utilization (Figure 13 relates schoolwide demographics to utilization) reported in the report's access findings, with school-level controls as printed.
"Even after controlling for a range of other school-level factors, schools with higher proportions of Black students and/or economically disadvantaged students evidenced lower levels of restorative practice utilization."
Darling-Hammond 2023 (2)¶
Darling-Hammond, S. (2023). Fostering belonging, transforming schools: The impact of restorative practices. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/169.703
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Student-level analyses reported in the implications section, stating within-school exposure disparities for Black and low-income students in the report's own words.
"The analyses presented in this report indicate that, even within a given school, restorative practice exposure is lower for Black students and students from low-income families (two groups that are particularly at risk of exposure to exclusionary discipline)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Shifting to restorative practices reduced exclusionary discipline and its racial disparities while improving climate and achievement — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Districts serving higher shares of Black, Hispanic/Latino, and economically disadvantaged students had significantly lower teacher certification rates — related
- TRP teachers who changed schools within their district tended to move to schools with similar low-income shares, a lower percentage of black students, and higher achievement — related
- Schools that increased restorative practice utilization saw declines in misbehavior, gang membership, victimization, depressive symptoms, and substance abuse, and improvements in GPA and climate — related
- Restorative practices reduce exclusionary discipline and misbehavior and improve school climate, safety, and achievement, though implementation requires sustained investment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
inequitable-access-restorative-practices |
title |
Access to restorative practices is inequitable: schools with more Black and economically disadvantaged students show lower restorative practice utilization |
description |
Access to restorative practices is inequitable: schools with more Black and economically disadvantaged students show lower restorative practice utilization |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
recheck_by |
2028 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — darling-hammond-2023, darling-hammond-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.