Claims

Access to restorative practices is inequitable: schools with more Black and economically disadvantaged students show lower restorative practice utilization

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Even after controlling for school-level factors, schools with higher proportions of Black and/or economically disadvantaged students evidenced lower restorative practice utilization. → Darling-Hammond 2023 q2 i? Even within a given school, restorative practice exposure is lower for Black students and students from low-income families. → Darling-Hammond 2023 (2)

Evidence

Darling-Hammond 2023

Darling-Hammond, S. (2023). Fostering belonging, transforming schools: The impact of restorative practices. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/169.703

q2 · i? · associational · r2

School-level regression analysis of restorative practice utilization (Figure 13 relates schoolwide demographics to utilization) reported in the report's access findings, with school-level controls as printed.

"Even after controlling for a range of other school-level factors, schools with higher proportions of Black students and/or economically disadvantaged students evidenced lower levels of restorative practice utilization."

Darling-Hammond 2023 (2)

Darling-Hammond, S. (2023). Fostering belonging, transforming schools: The impact of restorative practices. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/169.703

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Student-level analyses reported in the implications section, stating within-school exposure disparities for Black and low-income students in the report's own words.

"The analyses presented in this report indicate that, even within a given school, restorative practice exposure is lower for Black students and students from low-income families (two groups that are particularly at risk of exposure to exclusionary discipline)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id inequitable-access-restorative-practices
title Access to restorative practices is inequitable: schools with more Black and economically disadvantaged students show lower restorative practice utilization
description Access to restorative practices is inequitable: schools with more Black and economically disadvantaged students show lower restorative practice utilization
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
recheck_by 2028
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — darling-hammond-2023, darling-hammond-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.