Eleven-month-old infants who see a core knowledge violation preferentially explore the violating object over a novel distractor¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After seeing either a solidity or support violation, infants reversed the standard novelty preference and spent most exploration time on the object that had violated expectations. → Stahl Aimee E. 2019
Evidence¶
Stahl Aimee E. 2019¶
Stahl Aimee E., Feigenson Lisa. (2019). Violations of Core Knowledge Shape Early Learning. Topics in Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12389
q2 · i? · review · r2
Controlled lab experiment with 11-month-old infants who saw a single expected or surprising solidity or support event, then chose between the event object and a distractor. Infants seeing surprising outcomes "spending most of their time exploring the toy that had just violated their expectations" (Stahl & Feigenson, 2015).
"infants who had just seen the surprising outcome of either event (ball passed through wall, or car hovered in mid-air) reversed this preference, spending most of their time exploring the toy that had just violated their expectations"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Infants' exploratory behavior after a core knowledge violation is tailored to the type of violation seen — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Preliminary evidence that infants do not generalize surprise-induced exploration to same-category exemplars — related
- Learning enhancements from core knowledge violations are entity-specific: no benefit for unrelated bystander objects — related
- Eleven-month-old infants learn a new object-sound mapping after a surprising core knowledge violation but not after an expected outcome — related
- Core knowledge violations may be 'moderately impossible,' aligning with the Goldilocks effect on attention allocation — related
- Three- to six-year-old children learn novel verbs and nouns from a single exposure following core knowledge violations, including outside the laboratory — related
- Children's exploratory behavior is related to their question asking — related
- Impossible but not improbable events boost children's word learning, with step-like rather than graded performance — related
- Infant look-away follows a U-shaped pattern of information content, consistent with maintaining intermediate rates of information absorption (Goldilocks effect) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
infants-explore-core-knowledge-violating-objects |
title |
Eleven-month-old infants who see a core knowledge violation preferentially explore the violating object over a novel distractor |
description |
Eleven-month-old infants who see a core knowledge violation preferentially explore the violating object over a novel distractor |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stahl-aimee-e-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.