Claims

In an initial feedback survey, students strongly agreed the embodied activities were memorable, helped learning beyond lecture alone, and were recommendable to future groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Averaged ratings from 17 students eight weeks after the September 2019 session showed strong agreement that the activities were memorable (M = 1.23, SD = 0.43), helped learning more than lecture alone (M = 1.88, SD = 1.22), and would be recommended (M = 1.59, SD = 1.71) on a 1 (completely agree) to 5 scale. → B. D. M. Hatin 2020

Evidence

B. D. M. Hatin 2020

B. D. M. Hatin. (2020). Introducing students to neural communication: an embodied-learning classroom demonstration. npj Science of Learning 5:18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00077-1

q2 · i? · design · r2

An online feedback survey of 17 students eight weeks after the September 2019 session at the University of the West of Scotland; ratings from 1 (completely agree) to 5, with the printed means and SDs reported descriptively.

"A total of 17 students provided feedback, rating statements from 1 (completely agree) to 5 (completely disagree). According to the averaged student ratings, they highly agreed that the activities were memorable ( M = 1.23, SD = 0.43)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.