Students in the active-learning flipped course reported strongly positive attitudes, and course retention was higher than in the control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Survey percentages strongly favored the approach: 73.88% strongly agreed it helped learning, 90.05% strongly agreed they preferred active learning, and completion was 85% vs 73%. → Maria Entezari & Mohammad Javdan 2016

Evidence¶

Maria Entezari & Mohammad Javdan 2016¶

Maria Entezari & Mohammad Javdan. (2016). Active Learning and Flipped Classroom, Hand in Hand Approach to Improve Students Learning in Human Anatomy and Physiology. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 5, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n4p222

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Anonymous Likert-scale attitude survey administered to the treatment group and analyzed by an instructor from another institution, plus reported course-completion rates. Table 1 shows "73.88%" strongly agreed on learning improvement and "90.05%" strongly agreed on preferring active-learning style; retention was "85 %" vs "73%".

"As a result of the students’ course satisfaction, the rate of students’ retention was higher in the treatment group compare to the control group [the percentage of students who completed the course 85 % in the treatment group vs 73% in the control group]."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Learners reported mostly positive attitudes toward flipped learning in the learner-generated-materials pronunciation course — related
• The constructivist approach produces more positive attitudes towards lessons than traditional teaching, with an overall effect size of 0.728 across 43 Turkish studies — related
• In an initial feedback survey, students strongly agreed the embodied activities were memorable, helped learning beyond lecture alone, and were recommendable to future groups — related