Claims

Initial receptive vocabulary knowledge predicted response to universal Tier-1 vocabulary instruction for students receiving only classroom instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The relationship between initial PPVT score and expressive target word learning was virtually identical in the control and reference groups, consistent with Matthew effects in response to Tier-1 instruction. → Coyne 2019

Evidence

Coyne 2019

Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., Ware, S., Austin, C. R., Loftus-Rattan, S. M., & Baker, D. L. (2019). Racing Against the Vocabulary Gap: Matthew Effects in Early Vocabulary Instruction and Intervention. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918789162

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Descriptive comparison of the control (n = 781) and reference (n = 741) groups, who received only Tier-1 instruction. The article reports the association between fall PPVT and target word outcomes is illustrated in Figure 1 for all three groups.

"Therefore, there appears to be a similar positive association between initial general vocabulary knowledge and response to universal, Tier-1 vocabulary instruction for all students in our study who received only whole-class instruction, consistent with Matthew effects."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.