Claims

Tier-2 intervention improved listening comprehension of passages containing taught vocabulary, but the effect was not significant for students with initial PPVT scores more than 7 points below the mean

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Treatment students had higher listening comprehension scores than controls (γ1000 = 7.14), with moderation by initial PPVT (γ3000 = 0.53); the effect was significant only for students within 7 points below the mean. → Coyne 2019

Evidence

Coyne 2019

Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., Ware, S., Austin, C. R., Loftus-Rattan, S. M., & Baker, D. L. (2019). Racing Against the Vocabulary Gap: Matthew Effects in Early Vocabulary Instruction and Intervention. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918789162

q3 · i2 · causal · r3

Multilevel analysis of listening comprehension outcomes in the efficacy and replication studies. The article reports an overall mean effect size of 0.41, rising from 0.26 (5 points below the mean) to 0.56 (5 points above the mean).

"The effect of treatment on listening comprehension was statistically significant for at-risk students whose initial PPVT scores were less than 7 points below the mean but not statistically significant for students whose initial PPVT scores were more than 7 points below the mean."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.