Most inquiry threads produced by low-achieving students were classified as knowledge construction or knowledge building rather than knowledge sharing.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Of nine inquiry threads, four were classified as knowledge-building threads, four as knowledge-construction threads, and one as a knowledge-sharing thread. → Yang 2016

Evidence¶

Yang 2016¶

Yang, Y., van Aalst, J., Chan, C.K.K., & Tian, W. (2016). Reflective assessment in knowledge building by students with low academic achievement. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9239-1

q2 · i? · design · r2

Inquiry thread analysis of 148 notes yielding nine threads, classified using van Aalst's (2009) three-category scheme. The authors call this "a relatively positive result compared to previous studies."

"One of the nine inquiry threads was classified as a knowledge-sharing thread, four as knowledge-construction threads, and four as knowledge-building threads."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Collaboration and synthesis indicators in Knowledge Forum increased over time among low-achieving students.
• Students with low achievement can assume high-level responsibility for collectively accomplishing knowledge-building discourse in a supportive knowledge-building environment. — a broader claim this one bears on