Claims

Students with low achievement can assume high-level responsibility for collectively accomplishing knowledge-building discourse in a supportive knowledge-building environment.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a supportive knowledge-building environment, students with low achievement appeared able to assume high-level responsibility for collectively accomplishing knowledge-building discourse. → Yang 2016

Evidence

Yang 2016

Yang, Y., van Aalst, J., Chan, C.K.K., & Tian, W. (2016). Reflective assessment in knowledge building by students with low academic achievement. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9239-1

q2 · i? · design · r2

Qualitative analysis of 148 notes across nine inquiry threads from 20 Grade 11 low-achieving students, coded using van Aalst's framework. The authors conclude students "appeared to be able to assume the high-level responsibility for collectively accomplishing knowledge-building discourse."

"Overall, the above results suggest that in a supportive knowledge-building environment, students in this class appeared to be able to assume the high-level responsibility for collectively accomplishing knowledge-building discourse."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id low-achievers-collective-responsibility-knowledge-building
title Students with low achievement can assume high-level responsibility for collectively accomplishing knowledge-building discourse in a supportive knowledge-building environment.
description Students with low achievement can assume high-level responsibility for collectively accomplishing knowledge-building discourse in a supportive knowledge-building environment.
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yang-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.