Claims

Combining pronunciation instruction with monitor-strategy training greatly improves pronunciation accuracy in adult English majors

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's post-test scores improved significantly over pre-test in both vocabulary reading and sentence reading after instruction plus monitor training. → Qian Liu & Zunwei Fu 2011 q2 i? The difference between the experimental and control groups was significant in both post-tests though not at pre-test. → Qian Liu & Zunwei Fu 2011 (2)

Evidence

Qian Liu & Zunwei Fu 2011

Qian Liu & Zunwei Fu. (2011). The Combined Effect of Instruction and Monitor in Improving Pronunciation of Potential English Teachers. English Language Teaching, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p164

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 30 juniors in the experimental group; paired samples tests on vocabulary reading (T2) and sentence reading (T3) against pre-test (T1), with the article reporting "considerable improvement in both T2 and T3". Table 4 prints t = 14.429 and t = 12.882, both sig. .000; no effect size is printed.

"The results showed that its mean of T2 was 8.1677 and that of T3 was 7.533. As can be seen from table 4, the learners in this group had achieved considerable improvement in both T2 and T3, with that of T2 the most significant."

Qian Liu & Zunwei Fu 2011 (2)

Qian Liu & Zunwei Fu. (2011). The Combined Effect of Instruction and Monitor in Improving Pronunciation of Potential English Teachers. English Language Teaching, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p164

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent samples tests comparing the experimental and control groups on T2 and T3; Table 5 prints t = 13.309 (T2) and t = 10.747 (T3), df = 58, sig. .000. No effect size is printed, so impact is null.

"Though the performances of these two groups were judged to be similar in T1, the differences between them proved to be significant in both T2 and T3."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.