Instructors in their second or subsequent term using Lumen One made greater use of six of seven instructor-facing courseware components than first-term users.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Experience with the courseware over multiple terms was associated with greater use of instructor-facing supports. → Barbara Means 2026
Evidence¶
Barbara Means 2026¶
Barbara Means, Julie Neisler, Daniel Parker, Vanessa Peters Hinton, and Emily Pressler. (2026). Lessons From Implementing Courseware in Gateway Statistics Courses. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/12bb84f5-0073-40e6-85bb-41561222891b doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/292
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Self-report survey comparison of instructor-facing feature use by term of Lumen One implementation. Second-plus-term instructors "made greater use of six of the seven" components; question bank use "remained relatively consistent over time."
"Compared to instructors using Lumen One in their class for the first time, instructors in their second or subsequent term implementing Lumen One made greater use of six of the seven instructor-facing Lumen One components"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Meeting four or more implementation fidelity criteria is associated with course grades about 0.24 points higher than expected, a 0.58 grade-point swing versus meeting only two criteria. — related
- Digital Promise and Achieving the Dream interviewed undergraduate statistics students about their Lumen One courseware experience — related
- Adaptive courseware in a corequisite statistics course was associated with improved course outcomes, particularly for Pell-eligible and corequisite students, but effects are confounded with instructor practices — related
- Most instructors using adaptive courseware believed it improved student learning and would use it again — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
instructor-facing-use-increases-repeated-terms |
title |
Instructors in their second or subsequent term using Lumen One made greater use of six of seven instructor-facing courseware components than first-term users. |
description |
Instructors in their second or subsequent term using Lumen One made greater use of six of seven instructor-facing courseware components than first-term users. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-18 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — barbara-means-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.