Most instructors using adaptive courseware believed it improved student learning and would use it again¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? 89 percent of courseware-using instructors believed the product had improved student learning and 90 percent would use it again; two-thirds checked whole-class dashboards weekly or more. → Digital Promise 2020
Evidence¶
Digital Promise 2020¶
Digital Promise. (2020). Every Learner Everywhere and Lighthouse Institutions: First-Year Experiences. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/abf8db78-dc7a-4f4f-b06a-b00d1bda63e8 doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/99
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Online survey of instructors at nine of 10 piloting institutions; 39 courseware-using respondents (45 percent response rate). Most used blended approaches with 36 to 65 percent of learning through courseware; "Two-thirds (66 percent)" looked at whole-class dashboards weekly or more.
"A large majority of the instructors who used adaptive courseware in fall 2019 Every Learner Everywhere pilots (89 percent) believed using the product had improved student learning."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students in focus groups were positive about adaptive courseware but reported alignment, access, and reliability concerns — related
- About half of students reported instructors helped bridge courseware guidance and their understanding through outreach, availability, and responsiveness — related
- Adaptive courseware in a corequisite statistics course was associated with improved course outcomes, particularly for Pell-eligible and corequisite students, but effects are confounded with instructor practices — related
- Digital Promise and Achieving the Dream interviewed undergraduate statistics students about their Lumen One courseware experience — related
- Instructors in their second or subsequent term using Lumen One made greater use of six of seven instructor-facing courseware components than first-term users. — related
- Meeting four or more implementation fidelity criteria is associated with course grades about 0.24 points higher than expected, a 0.58 grade-point swing versus meeting only two criteria. — related
- Courseware impact varied by context: positive on average in 4-year institutions but insignificant in 2-year colleges, more positive in biology, psychology, and math/statistics, and positive when the comparison course was face-to-face rather than the same modality. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
instructors-positive-perceptions-adaptive-courseware |
title |
Most instructors using adaptive courseware believed it improved student learning and would use it again |
description |
Most instructors using adaptive courseware believed it improved student learning and would use it again |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — digital-promise-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.