Claims

Peer and instructor discourse shaped how teacher candidates experienced classroom conversations about LGBTQ+ issues

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Candidates expressed discomfort with microaggressions, dismissive attitudes, and inflexible perspectives from instructors or peers, which they perceived as damaging to inclusivity. → Hoda Harati 2026

Evidence

Hoda Harati 2026

Hoda Harati, Gretchen McAllister, Yingying Liu. (2026). Cultivating inclusive mindsets exploring faculty's and students' perspectives on using online simulations for inclusive pedagogy in teacher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10662-7

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Theme 3 of the candidate data analysis: candidates cited instructor behaviors such as voicing negative opinions or showing "little to no tolerance for innocent mistakes" as harmful to classroom inclusivity.

"These responses suggest that peer and instructor discourse played an important role in shaping how candidates experienced classroom conversations about LGBTQ + issues and inclusion."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.