The simulation increased teacher candidates' confidence and self-efficacy for addressing sensitive topics, but did not alleviate concerns about parent and administrator backlash¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitativer3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Post-survey responses indicated improved self-efficacy and greater willingness to tackle controversial topics. → Hoda Harati 2026
q2 i? The intervention did not significantly alleviate concerns about backlash from parents and administrators, and findings were not uniformly positive. → Hoda Harati 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Hoda Harati 2026¶
Hoda Harati, Gretchen McAllister, Yingying Liu. (2026). Cultivating inclusive mindsets exploring faculty's and students' perspectives on using online simulations for inclusive pedagogy in teacher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10662-7
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Thematic analysis of teacher candidates' pre/post write-in responses (N = 39). The article reports "a positive shift in self-efficacy accompanied by a greater willingness to tackle complex and controversial topics," with no effect size reported.
"Thematic analysis revealed a positive shift in self-efficacy accompanied by a greater willingness to tackle complex and controversial topics."
Hoda Harati 2026 (2)¶
Hoda Harati, Gretchen McAllister, Yingying Liu. (2026). Cultivating inclusive mindsets exploring faculty's and students' perspectives on using online simulations for inclusive pedagogy in teacher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10662-7
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Same thematic analysis of candidate responses; the article states the intervention "did not significantly alleviate concerns about backlash from parents and administrators," and some participants continued to express hesitation and uncertainty.
"While the intervention heightened TCs awareness of the complexities involved in teaching family diversity, evident through an increased desire for further training and a focus on fostering inclusive classroom environments, it did not significantly alleviate concerns about backlash from parents and administrators."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Training SRAE facilitators significantly increased their self-reported knowledge of self-regulation — related
- Faculty confidence in guiding student AI use rose markedly after the six-week institute, with high-confidence responses increasing from 0% to 60% — related
- Participants induced to hold high self-efficacy show greater improvement in visual discrimination sensitivity than participants induced to hold low self-efficacy — related
- Educators reported the promotion policy increased parental concern about student progress — related
- Teacher candidates moved from abstract inclusivity ideals to specific instructional and relational strategies after the simulation — related
- Peer and instructor discourse shaped how teacher candidates experienced classroom conversations about LGBTQ+ issues
- Single-group studies uniformly reported improvement after distance simulation training in self-assessment, knowledge, or skills — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.