Claims

Most integrated-course participants reported the format maximized learning time, inspired interest, enhanced understanding of key concepts, and allotted theory-practice time appropriately

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? In the feedback survey, 87.1% of participants said the integrated course enhanced their understanding of key concepts, 75.4% said it inspired interest, 72.3% said time allotment was appropriate, and 61.5% said it maximized learning time. → Lu et al. 2016

Evidence

Lu et al. 2016

Xiaoye Lu, Xin Cheng, Ke Li, Kenneth Ka Ho Lee & Xuesong Yang. (2016). Integration of Histology Lectures and Practical Teaching in China. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n4p157

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Online questionnaire (Sojump) of all 24 integrated-course participants; descriptive percentages only, no inferential test. The article also reports 75.4% agreement on interest, 72.3% on time allotment, and 61.5% on maximizing learning time.

"The vast majority of participants ( 87.1%) think that the format of the integrated course enhanced their understanding of the key concepts in histology as oppose to traditional didactic teaching"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.