Integrating spatially or temporally separated but related elements of instructional information produces a large average learning benefit for novices¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2006 · checked against its sources 2026-10-17 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Across 50 independent effects from between-group randomized studies, redesigns that increased spatial or temporal contiguity of related information yielded a weighted mean effect of d = 0.85 on learning performance. → Ginns 2006
Evidence¶
Ginns 2006¶
Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 511-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001
q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2
Random-effects meta-analysis of 50 effects representing 2375 students from 29 journal articles, 1 conference paper, and 1 PhD thesis, all between-group studies with random assignment. The article reports "d = 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.68 – 1.02)" with significant heterogeneity (Q = 117.77), indicating moderators condition the mean effect.
"the weighted mean effect size of the 50 effects was large, d = 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.68 – 1.02), and the homogeneity statistic was highly significant, Q = 117.77, df = 49, p < 0.001"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Split Attention Effect Degrades Learning — related
- Cognitive Load Reduction Improves Learning — related
- Presenting related material contiguously in space and time yields large learning benefits — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The learning benefit of increasing integration is substantially larger for high element interactivity (complex) materials than for low element interactivity materials — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Cognitive load effects including integration benefits may reverse for more experienced learners, whose schemas make integrated additional information redundant — related
- Spatial and temporal contiguity effects do not differ significantly in mean magnitude — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Split-attention and redundancy effects occur for high element interactivity material but disappear for low element interactivity material — related
- Contiguity effects show no statistically reliable difference between static and dynamic presentation of visual information — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- College students who study integrated annotated illustrations alongside science text generate approximately 50% more creative solutions on transfer problems than students who view the same illustrations separately after reading — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
integration-of-related-elements-large-mean-effect |
title |
Integrating spatially or temporally separated but related elements of instructional information produces a large average learning benefit for novices |
description |
Integrating spatially or temporally separated but related elements of instructional information produces a large average learning benefit for novices |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
source_checked |
2026-10-17 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ginns-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.