Receiving an intensive, one-on-one service may matter more than receiving services across multiple pillars¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The intensive, one-on-one character of a service may matter more for outcomes than whether students receive services across multiple pillars. → Margaret Sullivan 2018

Evidence¶

Margaret Sullivan 2018¶

Margaret Sullivan, Derek V. Price, Lindsay Fox, Ann Person. (2018). How Community Colleges Address Basic Needs and Financial Stability of Low-Income Students to Boost College Completion: Lessons from the Working Students Success Network. Oakland, CA: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/how-community-colleges-address-basic-needs-and-financial-stability-of-low-income-students-to-boost

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The report's key findings synthesize WSSN implementation and outcomes studies, stating that "Receiving an intensive, one-on-one service may matter more than receiving services across multiple pillars." No effect size is printed.

"Receiving an intensive, one-on-one service may matter more than receiving services across multiple pillars."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Colleges may reach more students with less intensive group-delivered services, while one-on-one services can be customized to individual needs and goals — related
• PROMISE's primary innovations over usual services were intensive case management, facilitating early work experiences, and a family focus — related
• Intensity of SES services and other provider characteristics are not significantly related to estimated impacts — related
• One-on-one service delivery may not be the only way to target services to individual student needs — related
• Control group members had ready access to transition-related services, and Way2Work services may have substituted for existing services — related