Metacognitive knowledge and intentions to use effective strategies do not reliably translate into actual strategy use (intention-behavior gap)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students often know which strategies are effective and intend to use them, yet fail to apply them consistently in practice, a discrepancy the article calls the intention-behavior gap. → Ann-Kathrin Krause 2025
Evidence¶
Ann-Kathrin Krause 2025¶
Ann-Kathrin Krause, Jasmin Breitwieser, Garvin Brod. (2025). Understanding Learning Strategy Use Through the Lens of Habit. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10087-3
q2 · i? · theoretical · r3
Narrative review of prior studies, attributed as the article attributes them: Blasiman et al. (2017) on knowledge and fading intentions, Rea et al. (2022) on vignette judgments diverging from own behavior, and Susser & McCabe (2013) on preferring spaced study ideally but cramming in practice.
"Blasiman et al. ( 2017) showed that students have relatively accurate metacognitive knowledge on the effectiveness of learning strategies and express the intention to use them. However, as the semester progresses, particularly toward the end as exams approach, they often struggle to maintain these intentions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Behavioral intention translates only weakly into self-reported use behavior, and the extended UTAUT model explains intention formation better than enactment — a broader claim this one bears on
- Behavioral intention has a statistically significant but weak positive effect on actual MALL usage behavior in EFL learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students' stated pre-interaction intentions only weakly correspond to their enacted help-seeking with an LLM — a broader claim this one bears on
- Learning-oriented intentions did not significantly predict enacted in-chat behavior; only selecting final solutions predicted executive and answer-seeking requests — related
- In a Vietnamese EFL sample, all six Meta-UTAUT hypotheses on MALL adoption were accepted with p-values below 0.05 — reports the opposite
- Actual classroom use of AI among Ghanaian pre-service science teachers is moderate despite strong intentions, indicating an intention-practice gap — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
intention-behavior-gap-strategy-use |
title |
Metacognitive knowledge and intentions to use effective strategies do not reliably translate into actual strategy use (intention-behavior gap) |
description |
Metacognitive knowledge and intentions to use effective strategies do not reliably translate into actual strategy use (intention-behavior gap) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ann-kathrin-krause-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.