Claims

Interactive learning produced a larger immediate gain in perceived benefits of breast self-awareness, but the comparison group sustained its gain over the treatment group by follow-up

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The treatment group showed a significantly larger immediate gain in perceived benefits of breast self-awareness than the comparison group, but the comparison group sustained its gain over the treatment group at 4-week follow-up. → Evans 2013

Evidence

Evans 2013

Evans, R. R., Horton, J. A., Ahmad, W. A., Davies, S. L., Snyder, S. W., & Macrina, D. M. (2013). Comparison of Breast Health Teaching Methods for Adolescent Females: Results of a Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Health Education Teaching, 4(1), 24-38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085320

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Repeated measures ANOVA on the benefits of breast self-awareness subscale (four items) in the same classroom-randomized quasi-experiment, plotted in Figure 4. The article reports a significantly larger treatment gain immediately post-survey, yet "the comparison group sustained their gain over the treatment group." No effect size is printed.

"The treatme nt group had a significantly larger gain than the comparison group in the perceived benefits of breast self -awareness (See Figure 4) but the comparison group sustained their gain over the treatment group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.