Claims

Knowledge and belief gains decayed from immediate post-test to 4-week follow-up regardless of teaching condition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Total scores for knowledge, susceptibility, seriousness, and benefits decreased, and perceived barriers of BSE scores increased, from immediate post-test to 4-week follow-up regardless of interactive learning or no interactive learning. → Evans 2013

Evidence

Evans 2013

Evans, R. R., Horton, J. A., Ahmad, W. A., Davies, S. L., Snyder, S. W., & Macrina, D. M. (2013). Comparison of Breast Health Teaching Methods for Adolescent Females: Results of a Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Health Education Teaching, 4(1), 24-38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085320

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Comparison of immediate post-test/survey scores to 4-week follow-up scores in the classroom-randomized quasi-experiment (302 of 310 participants completed the follow-up). The article reports scores "decreased" and barriers scores "increased" regardless of condition. No effect sizes are printed.

"total score s for each var iable decreased and the perceived barriers of BSE scores increased ( See Figure 4), regardless of breast health interactive learning or no interactive learning"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.