Claims

The review attributes implementation-strategies effectiveness to experiential, interactive, and patient-centered learning methods alongside traditional lectures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors interpret significant effects on knowledge, skills, and attitudes as likely due to experiential and interactive learning methods and patient-centered approaches in addition to traditional lectures. → Rendrayani Farida 2024

Evidence

Rendrayani Farida 2024

Rendrayani Farida, Utami Auliasari M., Insani Widya N., Puspita Falerina, Alfian Sofa D., Nguyen Thang, Puspitasari Irma M. (2024). Interventions to improve pharmacists’ competency in chronic disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06393-z

q1 · i? · review · r2

Authors' interpretation in the discussion, not a tested result: the review suggests "experiential and interactive learning methods" and patient-centered approaches explain the improvements, citing role-playing, problem-based exercises, simulation, and patient interviews. No direct comparison of methods was performed.

"This is likely due to the use of experiential and interactive learning methods [19, 20, 48–51, 53, 54], as well as patient-centered approaches [48], in addition to traditional lectures."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.