Claims

Interdistrict desegregation choice programs show achievement and graduation benefits for disadvantaged students, with stronger outcomes the longer students remain

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In interdistrict desegregation programs with long-term data (Hartford, Milwaukee, St. Louis), benefits were found for achievement and graduation rates, stronger with longer participation. → Cookson 2018

Evidence

Cookson 2018

Cookson, P. W., Jr., Darling-Hammond, L., Rothman, R., & Shields, P. M. (2018). The tapestry of American public education: How we can create a system of schools worth choosing for all? Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/tapestry-american-public-education

q2 · i? · review · r2

The report's review of research on eight interdistrict school desegregation programs serving disadvantaged Black and Hispanic students transferring to more affluent suburban schools. All programs were oversubscribed with waiting lists; benefits were also found for interracial attitudes and relationships.

"In the three programs that offered long-term outcome data (Hartford, CT; Milwaukee, WI; and St. Louis, MO), benefits were found for both achievement and graduation rates, with stronger outcomes the longer the students remained in the more affluent, suburban schools."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id interdistrict-desegregation-benefits
title Interdistrict desegregation choice programs show achievement and graduation benefits for disadvantaged students, with stronger outcomes the longer students remain
description Interdistrict desegregation choice programs show achievement and graduation benefits for disadvantaged students, with stronger outcomes the longer students remain
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — cookson-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.