Claims

At a 1-day test delay, interleaved practice yields a moderate benefit over blocked practice (d = 0.42)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Students tested 1 day after the review scored 80% vs. 64%, a statistically significant moderate interleaving benefit (d = 0.42). → Rohrer 2015

Evidence

Rohrer 2015

Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Stershic, S. (2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 900-908. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000001

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Classroom test administered 1 day after the review session, comparing students assigned to the 1-day delay (n = 63 per delay group as printed). Interleaved mean was 80% versus blocked 64%, with Cohen's d = 0.42 and 95% CI [0.07, 0.77].

"Students tested 1 day after the review showed a moderate benefit of interleaving, 80% (SD = 33%) vs. 64% (SD = 42%), t(62) = 2.39, p = .02, d = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.07, 0.77]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id interleaved-benefit-one-day-delay-d042
title At a 1-day test delay, interleaved practice yields a moderate benefit over blocked practice (d = 0.42)
description At a 1-day test delay, interleaved practice yields a moderate benefit over blocked practice (d = 0.42)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rohrer-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.