In Experiment 2, the interleaving benefit on actual test outcomes was not statistically significant, unlike in Experiment 1¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 Actual learning outcomes were numerically higher for interleaved than blocked studying (d = -0.23) but the difference was not statistically significant. → Janssen 2023
Evidence¶
Janssen 2023¶
Janssen, E. M., van Gog, T., van de Groep, L., de Lange, A. J., Knopper, R. L., Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2023). The Role of Mental Effort in Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Interleaved and Blocked Study Strategies and Their Willingness to Use Them. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09797-3
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Experiment 2 independent t-test (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.025) on the 10-item test found the interleaved condition scored higher numerically but "not statistically significant", t(297) = -1.99, p = 0.048, Cohen's d = -0.23.
"the actual learning outcomes were higher for the interleaved study condition (M = 6.92, SD = 2.06) than for the blocked study condition (M = 5.83, SD = 1.60). However, in contrast to our expectations, this difference was not statistically significant, t(297) = -1.99, p = 0.048, Cohen's d = -0.23."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Interleaved practice produces higher mathematics test scores than blocked practice in a classroom experiment — related
- At a 1-day test delay, interleaved practice yields a moderate benefit over blocked practice (d = 0.42) — related
- The interleaving benefit appears in three of four problem-type-by-delay comparisons; the slope-problem effect at 1 day was not statistically significant — related
- The test benefit of interleaved practice does not diminish over time and perhaps grows larger (d = 0.79 at 30 days) — related
- The interleaving benefit is not caused by spacing, and the benefit extends to delayed tests — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
interleaving-outcome-benefit-nonsignificant-exp2 |
title |
In Experiment 2, the interleaving benefit on actual test outcomes was not statistically significant, unlike in Experiment 1 |
description |
In Experiment 2, the interleaving benefit on actual test outcomes was not statistically significant, unlike in Experiment 1 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — janssen-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.