Claims

In Experiment 2, the interleaving benefit on actual test outcomes was not statistically significant, unlike in Experiment 1

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 Actual learning outcomes were numerically higher for interleaved than blocked studying (d = -0.23) but the difference was not statistically significant. → Janssen 2023

Evidence

Janssen 2023

Janssen, E. M., van Gog, T., van de Groep, L., de Lange, A. J., Knopper, R. L., Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2023). The Role of Mental Effort in Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Interleaved and Blocked Study Strategies and Their Willingness to Use Them. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09797-3

q3 · i1 · causal · r2

Experiment 2 independent t-test (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.025) on the 10-item test found the interleaved condition scored higher numerically but "not statistically significant", t(297) = -1.99, p = 0.048, Cohen's d = -0.23.

"the actual learning outcomes were higher for the interleaved study condition (M = 6.92, SD = 2.06) than for the blocked study condition (M = 5.83, SD = 1.60). However, in contrast to our expectations, this difference was not statistically significant, t(297) = -1.99, p = 0.048, Cohen's d = -0.23."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id interleaving-outcome-benefit-nonsignificant-exp2
title In Experiment 2, the interleaving benefit on actual test outcomes was not statistically significant, unlike in Experiment 1
description In Experiment 2, the interleaving benefit on actual test outcomes was not statistically significant, unlike in Experiment 1
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — janssen-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.