The value of the proposed interventions depends on the stakeholder's vantage point, desired outcomes, youth subpopulation, and available resources¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The report argues that the value of the proposed interventions varies by stakeholder position in the transition system, target outcomes, youth subpopulation of interest, and available resources. → Todd Honeycutt 2021

Evidence¶

Todd Honeycutt 2021¶

Todd Honeycutt, Kara Contreary, Gina Livermore. (2021). Considerations for the Papers Developed for the SSI Youth Solutions Project. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/considerations-for-the-papers-developed-for-the-ssi-youth-solutions-project

q1 · i? · review · r?

Interpretive synthesis claim from the report's key findings: the authors state the interventions' value "might depend on a stakeholder's vantage point," listing position in the transition system, desired outcomes, youth types, and resources. No data test this assertion.

"The value of the proposed interventions might depend on a stakeholder's vantage point: where they sit in the transition system, what outcomes they want to achieve, the types of youth in which they are interested, and the resources they have available."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Common gaps in the SSI Youth Solutions proposal papers concern effects on employment outcomes, costs, and implementation challenges — related
• All 12 proposed SSI Youth Solutions interventions explicitly or implicitly aim to increase employment among youth with disabilities as a long-term outcome — related
• Identifying SSI youth for outreach is challenging under the current transition system — related
• Many SSI youth received transition services without PROMISE, but there was substantial room for PROMISE to improve service use — related
• The increased number and specificity of policy requirements challenged implementation flexibility, with some viewing the policy as one-size-fits-all — related