Many SSI youth received transition services without PROMISE, but there was substantial room for PROMISE to improve service use¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Many SSI youth already received transition services without PROMISE, yet substantial room remained for PROMISE to improve service use. → Gina Livermore 2020
Evidence¶
Gina Livermore 2020¶
Gina Livermore, Todd Honeycutt, Arif Mamun, Jacqueline Kauff. (2020). Insights About the Transition System for SSI Youth from the National Evaluation of Promoting Readiness of Minors in SSI (PROMISE). Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 52, no. 1. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/insights-about-the-transition-system-for-ssi-youth-from-the-national-evaluation-of-promoting doi:10.3233/jvr-191056
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Finding from the national PROMISE evaluation, which relied on a randomized controlled trial design and information from staff interviews, surveys of parents and youth, and program administrative data. The authors report that "many SSI youth received transition services without PROMISE" while service use could still be improved.
"many SSI youth received transition services without PROMISE, but that there was substantial room for PROMISE to improve service use"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- PROMISE's primary innovations over usual services were intensive case management, facilitating early work experiences, and a family focus — related
- Identifying SSI youth for outreach is challenging under the current transition system — related
- The intensive case management offered by PROMISE might be difficult to sustain in the current system — related
- All 12 proposed SSI Youth Solutions interventions explicitly or implicitly aim to increase employment among youth with disabilities as a long-term outcome — related
- Control group members had ready access to transition-related services, and Way2Work services may have substituted for existing services — related
- Participation in key transition activities, including discussing transition plans with school staff and student employment during high school, declined over the decade — related
- The PROMISE interim report estimated impacts across seven outcome domains for youth and families — related
- The value of the proposed interventions depends on the stakeholder's vantage point, desired outcomes, youth subpopulation, and available resources — related
- PROMISE youth experienced worse education and employment outcomes than ACS youth with and without disabilities — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
promise-ssi-youth-transition-services-baseline-room-for-improvement |
title |
Many SSI youth received transition services without PROMISE, but there was substantial room for PROMISE to improve service use |
description |
Many SSI youth received transition services without PROMISE, but there was substantial room for PROMISE to improve service use |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gina-livermore-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.