Curiosity and confidence show an inverted U-shaped relationship, peaking at an intermediate confidence level¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In Experiment 1, curiosity peaked at an intermediate confidence level (around 0.43), with a significant quadratic coefficient. → Sunae Kim 2025

Evidence¶

Sunae Kim 2025¶

Sunae Kim, Paul L Harris, Benjamin Néher. (2025). Curiosity can influence metacognitive processes. Metacognition and Learning (2025) 20:39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09444-y

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Experiment 1 regression of curiosity on confidence P and P*(1−P), following prior analytical approaches (e.g., Baranes et al.; Kang et al.). The model gave "R2 = 0.21" and a significant quadratic coefficient b = 3.82, p <.001; the linear coefficient was also significant (b = −0.55, p <.001).

"The model provided R2 = 0.21 and a significant quadratic coefficient (b = 3.82, p <.001), with curiosity at its peak at an intermediate confidence level of around 0.43, confirming an inverted U-shaped relationship"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Without feedback, people are more curious about high-confidence errors than about equally high-confidence correct answers, replicated across experiments
• The relationship between effort and meaning follows an inverted U-shape: moderate friction enhances meaning and motivation while excessive friction overwhelms
• Effortful regulation is maximized at moderate levels of emotional and physiological reactivity and declines at very low or very high levels
• Yes/no feedback that participants were correct nearly quenched curiosity for correct answers, whereas without feedback curiosity peaked at moderate-to-high confidence — related
• Curiosity ratings are functionally distinct from subjective uncertainty ratings: uncertainty declines near-linearly with confidence while curiosity is inverted-U shaped — related
• Curiosity about trivia answers is a U-shaped function of confidence, supporting information-gap theory — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Low and medium Knowledge Confidence heighten curiosity, contradicting the predicted inverted U-shaped relationship — reports the opposite
• Only medium-level incongruity between individual knowledge and wiki information causes cognitive conflict that motivates equilibration — related
• Non-linear (Goldilocks) effects of expectations and aspirations on outcomes are small and largely non-significant — related