Claims

Interactive open learner modelling dialogue produced resultant learner models with more beliefs than initial models, most approved by both learners and a teacher

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Compared to initial learner models, resultant learner models after interactive open learner modelling included more beliefs about the learner, and most were approved by both learners and the finance terminology teacher. → Vania Dimitrova & Paul Brna 2016

Evidence

Vania Dimitrova & Paul Brna 2016

Vania Dimitrova & Paul Brna. (2016). From Interactive Open Learner Modelling to Intelligent Mentoring: STyLE-OLM and Beyond. Int J Artif Intell Educ 26:332–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0087-3

q2 · i? · design · r2

User study in the EU LARFLAST project with university students of varying finance knowledge; STyLE-OLM was invoked after an initial learner model was obtained, learners confirmed or rejected LM beliefs, and a finance terminology teacher examined interaction scripts and the resultant LM. The article reports that "most of these beliefs were approved by both the learners and the teacher"; no effect size is printed.

"The study showed that, compared to the initial learner models (before the learners engaged in interactive open leaner modelling dialogue), the resultant learner models included more beliefs about the learner, and most of these beliefs were approved by both the learners and the teacher."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id iolm-dialogue-increases-lm-beliefs-approved
title Interactive open learner modelling dialogue produced resultant learner models with more beliefs than initial models, most approved by both learners and a teacher
description Interactive open learner modelling dialogue produced resultant learner models with more beliefs than initial models, most approved by both learners and a teacher
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — vania-dimitrova-paul-brna-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.