Claims

The iPad helped a student with ADHD focus attention and become more metacognitive about his reading

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The iPad helped the student focus attention and facilitated his becoming much more metacognitive in his reading. → McClanahan 2012

Evidence

McClanahan 2012

McClanahan, B., Williams, K., Kennedy, E., & Tate, S. (2012). A Breakthrough for Josh: How Use of an iPad Facilitated Reading Improvement. TechTrends, 56(3). https://link.springer.com/journal/11528

q1 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative observation from the case study. During initial testing Josh could not stay focused, but while working on an iPad game he "sat perfectly still for at least 10 minutes and stayed totally focused on the game." Metacognition appeared when he realized he needed to slow down while reading aloud.

"The device not only helped the student focus attention, it facilitated his becoming much more metacognitive in his reading."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ipad-supported-attention-and-metacognition-adhd-reader
title The iPad helped a student with ADHD focus attention and become more metacognitive about his reading
description The iPad helped a student with ADHD focus attention and become more metacognitive about his reading
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mcclanahan-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.