Validity evidence for the IRLA is disaggregated across grade, program, and race/ethnicity¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The study disaggregates validity evidence across grade, program, and race/ethnicity to understand how the assessment functions among demographic categories. → Beth Tarasawa 2016
Evidence¶
Beth Tarasawa 2016¶
Beth Tarasawa, Nicole Ralston, Jacqueline Waggoner, Amy Jackson. (2016). Concurrent validity of the independent reading level assessment framework and a state assessment. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 19(2), 1–8. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/concurrent-validity-of-the-independent-reading-level-assessment-framework-and-a-state-assessment/
q2 · i? · associational · r?
The abstract states the study "builds on existing literature by disaggregating the validity evidence across grade, program, and race/ethnicity." The available text reports no subgroup results or statistics.
"Furthermore, this study builds on existing literature by disaggregating the validity evidence across grade, program, and race/ethnicity to better understand how the assessment functions amongst varying demographic categories."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The study collects concurrent validity evidence on the IRLA framework as a potential RTI screening tool — related
- Achievement declines from 2019 to 2022 were smaller for Asian American and White first and second graders than for Hispanic, Black, and AIAN students — related
- Asian and white CPS students score consistently higher than Latino and African-American students in reading and math, and Asian students score significantly higher in math than white students — related
- Gender differences in ninth-grade math grades were similar across racial/ethnic groups, with young men earning fewer points in every group — related
- Systematic racial, ethnic and gender differences in grades persist among students with the same test scores, attendance, courses and teachers — related
- Ninth-grade GPAs varied substantially by gender, race/ethnicity, neighborhood SES, incoming test scores, course level, and school — related
- Kindergarten entry-age effects do not differ by gender or race — related
- Disaggregating by race and income can show aggregate subgroup gaps largely reflect differing subgroup compositions (hypothetical example) — related
- Only 1.3% of articles in top-tier educational psychology journals focused on race — related
- The authors argue the IRLA may help bridge screening and intensive, systematic instruction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
irla-validity-disaggregated-demographics |
title |
Validity evidence for the IRLA is disaggregated across grade, program, and race/ethnicity |
description |
Validity evidence for the IRLA is disaggregated across grade, program, and race/ethnicity |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
recheck_by |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — beth-tarasawa-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.