Claims

Physics students taught with the Inquiry Training model based on JITT show higher problem-solving ability than students taught with cooperative learning in General Physics II

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Posttest problem-solving ability differed significantly between the IT-JITT experimental class and the cooperative-learning control class (F = 55.725, sig. = 0.000). → Turnip et al. 2016

Evidence

Turnip et al. 2016

Betty Turnip, Ida Wahyuni, Yul Ifda Tanjung. (2016). The Effect of Inquiry Training Learning Model Based on Just in Time Teaching for Problem Solving Skill. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103095

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with two-group pretest-posttest design; experimental class used IT-JITT, control class used cooperative learning, sampled by cluster random sampling. One-way ANOVA on posttest problem-solving scores gave "F = 55.725 and sig. = 0.000"; no effect size is printed.

"From the results of hypothesis testing data in Tabl e 2 is shown posttes obtained F = 55.725 and sig. = 0.000, it means H a received and H 0 is rejected"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.