Fewer than 10% of recent ITS papers address most developing-world adoption barriers, and almost 95% of ITS research still targets traditional computers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Very few recent ITS papers address developing-world barriers (<10% for most categories and samples), with mobile devices, culture, and language support noted in over 4% of papers and basic ICT skills in only 2%. → Benjamin D. Nye 2015
q3 i? Despite more people using smartphones than computers, almost 95% of ITS research still targets traditional computers. → Benjamin D. Nye 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Benjamin D. Nye 2015¶
Benjamin D. Nye. (2015). Intelligent Tutoring Systems by and for the Developing World: A Review of Trends and Approaches for Educational Technology in a Global Context. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6
q3 · i? · review · r3
Systematic mapping study classifying 815 ITS papers and 373 architecture families against eight Boolean barrier criteria (Table 1). Hardware sharing, data transmission, electricity, and Internet reliability were barely addressed; for comparison, over 45% of papers addressed student motivation.
"Overall, a very small number of recent ITS papers approached any of these topics (<10 % for most categories and samples, excepting papers from major ITS families discussing mobile access, Internet reliability, culture, and language)."
Benjamin D. Nye 2015 (2)¶
Benjamin D. Nye. (2015). Intelligent Tutoring Systems by and for the Developing World: A Review of Trends and Approaches for Educational Technology in a Global Context. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6
q3 · i? · review · r3
Same mapping study, discussing the mobile-platform criterion (5.77% of all ITS papers). The review argues this matters because emerging and developing economies appear to be leapfrogging traditional computers, similar to how they leapfrogged landline phones.
"While mobile support was the most prevalent category, the focus was still low compared to their prevalence. While more people in the world use a smartphone than a computer (desktop or laptop), almost 95 % of ITS research still targets traditional computers."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students' basic ICT skills pose little barrier in classroom settings but major hurdles for individual and mobile use, mitigated by peer support and initial device setup — related
- GenAI used on mobile devices shows a larger motivational effect than GenAI used on computers (exploratory) — related
- Participants who accessed the report card site with mobile devices had more difficulty using it — related
- Mobile devices make education more accessible anytime and anywhere, but this attractiveness comes with limitations for adoption and usage — related
- Evaluated technology-delivered literacy programs are overwhelmingly multicomponent (90%), publicly available, computer/laptop-delivered, and school-based, targeting an average of four literacy skills — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
its-barriers-low-research-coverage |
title |
Fewer than 10% of recent ITS papers address most developing-world adoption barriers, and almost 95% of ITS research still targets traditional computers |
description |
Fewer than 10% of recent ITS papers address most developing-world adoption barriers, and almost 95% of ITS research still targets traditional computers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — benjamin-d-nye-2015, benjamin-d-nye-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.