In the Jeremy's Journal simulation, Equality-mindset participants more often cited school policy while Equity-mindset participants prioritized the student's health¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In Jeremy's Journal, participants with more of an Equality mindset were more likely to mention the doctor's note school policy, while participants demonstrating an Equity mindset were more likely to prioritize Jeremy's health and well-being. → Littenberg-Tobias 2021
Evidence¶
Littenberg-Tobias 2021¶
Littenberg-Tobias, J., Borneman, E., & Reich, J. (2021). Measuring Equity-Promoting Behaviors in Digital Teaching Simulations: A Topic Modeling Approach. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211045685
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Topic-prevalence analysis of Jeremy's Journal simulation responses (N = 13,160 sentence rows) correlated with the Equality-Equity survey scale. Equality-mindset participants mentioned the doctor's note policy; Equity-mindset participants "were more likely to prioritize Jeremy's health and well-being" (Topic 7).
"Participants with more of an Equality mindset were more likely to mention the fact that school policy required students to submit a doctor's note when they were sick (Topic 10, "Doctor's note and school policy")."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In Coach Wright, Asset-mindset participants noticed Jeremy's positive behaviors while Deficit-mindset participants framed behavior as rule compliance, and strength language sometimes appeared without referencing actual strengths — related
- Structural topic modeling identifies simulation decision points indicative of different equity mindsets across four digital teaching simulations — a broader claim this one bears on
- In Layers, Context-Centered-mindset participants drew on students' communities and home lives while Context-Neutral-mindset participants adapted content without students' out-of-school experiences — related
- Existing health equity frameworks often lack implementation guidance and treat equity as distributive rather than addressing how inequity is produced — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
jeremy-journal-topics-track-equality-equity-mindsets |
title |
In the Jeremy's Journal simulation, Equality-mindset participants more often cited school policy while Equity-mindset participants prioritized the student's health |
description |
In the Jeremy's Journal simulation, Equality-mindset participants more often cited school policy while Equity-mindset participants prioritized the student's health |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — littenberg-tobias-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.