Claims

The effect of Jigsaw teaching on scientific concept acquisition did not differ by student gender

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i0 ANCOVA showed no statistically significant differences at the 0.05 level for gender (F = 0.001, significance .982, Eta Square 0.000). → Hamadneh 2017

Evidence

Hamadneh 2017

Dr. Qaseem Mohammad Salim Hamadneh. (2017). The Effect of Using Jigsaw Strategy in Teaching Science on the Acquisition of Scientific Concepts Among the Fourth Graders of Bani Kinana Directorate of Education. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.8, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133045

q2 · i0 · causal · r1

ANCOVA of post-test scores in the same 70-student semi-experimental study found the gender effect negligible: the printed effect size was 0.000, and the author notes both male and female students had "the same teaching environment and the same educational opportunities".

"The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences at the level of (0.05) for the variable of gender as the value of (F) was (0.001) by a statistical significance of (.982)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.