Claims

Students taught with jigsaw reported positive views, rating it highly effective, student-centered, and achievement-enhancing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the Jigsaw Opinion Scale, the most-endorsed category (85-100%) included opinions that jigsaw is highly effective, student-centered, builds friendship bonds, and gives self-confidence. → Yapıcı 2016

Evidence

Yapıcı 2016

Hakkı Yapıcı. (2016). Use of jigsaw technique to teach the unit "science within time" in secondary 7th grade social sciences course and students' views on this technique. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(8), 773-780. https://www.academicjournals.org/ERR

q2 · i? · causal · r1

The Jigsaw Opinion Scale (15 items, Cronbach alpha 0.74) was given post-teaching to the experimental group only; responses were grouped into percentage categories, with the top category containing the quoted opinions.

"85-100% A highly effective method; Student-centered; Builds a bond of friendship in the group; Gives self-confidence prominence; A democratic environment between student and teacher"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.