Claims

JiTT implementation was associated with a decreased DFW rate in Contemporary Biology, from 27% to 20%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2004 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Since implementing JiTT in Contemporary Biology, the DFW rate decreased from 27% to 20%, meaning 80% of students completed with A, B, or C. → Marrs 2004

Evidence

Marrs 2004

Marrs, K.A., and Novak, G. (2004). Just-in-Time Teaching in Biology: Creating an Active Learner Classroom Using the Internet. Cell Biology Education 3, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.03-11-0022

q2 · i? · design · r2

Course-level retention comparison reported for Contemporary Biology N100 before and after JiTT implementation. The article reports the DFW rate "decreased from 27% to 20%"; no statistical test or effect size is printed. A parallel physics figure (33% to 19%) is also reported.

"Since implementing JiTT in contemporary biology, the DFW rate has decreased from 27% to 20%; mean- ing that 80% of the students taking N100 will now complete the course with a grade of A, B, or C."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id jitt-decreased-dfw-rate-n100
title JiTT implementation was associated with a decreased DFW rate in Contemporary Biology, from 27% to 20%
description JiTT implementation was associated with a decreased DFW rate in Contemporary Biology, from 27% to 20%
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2004
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — marrs-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.