The WWC rated JOBSTART as having potentially positive effects on completing school, based on a small extent of evidence from a single study¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The WWC assigned JOBSTART its highest applicable rating, 'potentially positive effects,' because one study meeting evidence standards found a statistically significant effect and no study found negative effects in the domain; the rating did not meet criteria for 'positive effects' because only one qualifying study existed. → What Works Clearinghouse 2008
Evidence¶
What Works Clearinghouse 2008¶
What Works Clearinghouse. (2008). WWC Intervention Report: JOBSTART. U.S. Department of Education, What Works Clearinghouse. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Appendix A5 documents the WWC rating decision: Criterion 1 for potentially positive effects was met by one statistically significant study, Criterion 2 was met because no study found statistically significant or substantively important negative effects, and the stronger 'positive effects' criterion of two or more studies was not met.
"It did not meet the criteria for positive effects because only one study showed a statistically significant or substantively important effect in this domain."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The evidence base for SMART® is a single small-extent RCT, capping the intervention rating at potentially positive effects — related
- The WWC rates GEMS® Space Science Sequence as having potentially positive effects on general science achievement, with a small extent of evidence — related
- The evidence base for Waterford Early Reading Program™ is thin: only one of 36 reviewed studies met WWC evidence standards, and extent of evidence was rated small for both domains — related
- The WWC rated DreamBox Learning as having potentially positive effects on mathematics achievement with a small extent of evidence — related
- The WWC rates UCSMP Algebra as having potentially positive effects on mathematics achievement for secondary students — related
- The evidence base for Headsprout Early Reading is limited to one small RCT, supporting only a potentially positive rating — related
- The WWC rated Arthur as having potentially positive effects rather than positive effects because only one study met evidence standards and it lacked a strong design — related
- The WWC rated Talent Search as having potentially positive effects on completing school, capped below positive because both studies were quasi-experimental — related
- The evidence base for the program is a single RCT of 3,074 randomly assigned youth, with 1,196 in the follow-up analysis sample, and the WWC rates the extent of evidence as small — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The WWC rates The Expert Mathematician as having potentially positive effects on middle school mathematics achievement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
jobstart-wwc-potentially-positive-rating |
title |
The WWC rated JOBSTART as having potentially positive effects on completing school, based on a small extent of evidence from a single study |
description |
The WWC rated JOBSTART as having potentially positive effects on completing school, based on a small extent of evidence from a single study |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.