Resolution of JOLs increases across study–test cycles, improving between Cycles 1 and 2 but not from Cycle 2 to Cycle 3¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Learners' resolution (within-participant gamma) improved from Cycle 1 to Cycle 2 but not from Cycle 2 to Cycle 3, for both encoding types. → Kubik 2022
Evidence¶
Kubik 2022¶
Kubik, V., Jemstedt, A., Mahjub Eshratabadi, H., Schwartz, B. L., & Jönsson, F. U. (2022). The underconfidence-with-practice effect in action memory: The contribution of retrieval practice to metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09288-2
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Within the same experiment, resolution for study–test items was computed as within-participant Goodman–Kruskal gamma; the main effect of cycle showed "F(1.76, 82.86) = 8.50, p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.078", with means rising from 0.37 to 0.69, then not further to 0.60 in Cycle 3.
"As indicated by a main effect of cycle, F(1.76, 82.86) = 8.50, p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.078, learners improved their resolution scores from Cycle 1 ( M = 0.37, SE = 0.06) to Cycle 2 ( M = 0.69, SE = 0.06)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Test experience alleviates the foresight bias more effectively than study experience — related
- Past-test correlations exceed concurrent resolution scores, and JOLs rise for previously recalled items while falling for nonrecalled items — related
- Enactment impairs resolution of JOLs relative to verbal encoding of action phrases — related
- JOLs for study–test items increase faster across cycles than JOLs for study–study items, reducing underconfidence relative to restudy practice — related
- Monitoring resolution improves with study–test practice, with larger gains for backward than for forward pairs — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Calibration of JOLs shifts toward underconfidence across learning cycles for action phrases under both verbal and enactive encoding, without first-cycle overconfidence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
jol-resolution-increases-across-cycles |
title |
Resolution of JOLs increases across study–test cycles, improving between Cycles 1 and 2 but not from Cycle 2 to Cycle 3 |
description |
Resolution of JOLs increases across study–test cycles, improving between Cycles 1 and 2 but not from Cycle 2 to Cycle 3 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kubik-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.